Animal Bite Overview

• Auto Accident
• Birth Injury
• Birth Defects
• Cerebral Palsy
• Plane Crash
• Prescription Error
• Prescription Medications
• Sitemap
• Resource Links

• General Practice
• Criminal Defense
• Custody Divorce Family Paternity
• DUI OWI Traffic Tickets
• P I Accident Wrongful Death
• Blogs

Animal Bites - An Overview

Every year, millions of Americans are bitten by animals. In many cases, a person bitten by an animal may have a legal right to recover damages from the animal's owner or another responsible party. If you have been injured by an animal bite, contact an attorney to determine your rights. A personal injury lawyer experienced in animal bite litigation can help you learn what your rights are.

If You are Bitten by an Animal

The first thing you should do if you are bitten by an animal is to seek medical attention immediately. If you are not treated, an animal bite can cause serious injury or death. Once you have been medically evaluated, you should also consider consulting with a lawyer experienced in animal bite cases. An attorney will be able to tell you whether you have a legal claim, and what damages you may be able to recover.

An attorney will ask you for detailed information about the circumstances surrounding your animal bite. At a minimum, you should provide the name and phone number of the animal's owner. If you don't have this information, a neighbor or a witness might be able to provide it to you. Also, if there were witnesses, you should get their names and contact information as well.

Owner Liability for Animal Bites

If an animal bites you, the first thing to determine is: who is the owner of the animal? In most states, the owner of an animal can be held liable for the injuries it inflicts, provided that the owner knew (or had reason to know) that the animal had "dangerous propensities." In other words, if an animal owner knows that his or her animal is dangerous and could cause injury to a person, the animal owner can be held liable for the animal's harmful actions

Determining whether an owner knew of an animal's "dangerous propensities" can be difficult. The first question that often arises in making this determination is whether the owner needs to know of the particular animal's potential for harm, or whether the owner only needs to know that type of animal is potentially harmful. For example, when a person has a pit bull as a pet, does that mean the owner knows or should know the pet will be harmful, just because, in general, pit bulls can be harmful?

Most courts have ruled that an animal owner is responsible for knowing both the particular and general potential for his animal to cause harm. Thus, even if a pit bull owner had never seen his pet act viciously, he might still be held responsible for an attack by the dog because of the propensity of pit bulls in general to be aggressive animals. In such a situation, the owner is said to have "constructive notice" of the animal's vicious propensities.

Additionally, sometimes an animal's vicious propensity may be inferred from the circumstances of the attack. For instance, if a trained guard dog attacks someone, a judge or court could infer that the owner knew or should have known the dog would attack someone who entered the area the dog was guarding.

Some states impose what is known as "strict liability" upon animal owners whose animals bite or attack others. Under the theory of strict liability, an owner is legally responsible (liable) for an animal bite, regardless of whether the owner did anything wrong with respect to protecting others from attack. Under this theory, even if the owner had no reason to know that his or her animal was dangerous, if the animal bit someone, the owner would still be liable.

Potential Defenses in Animal Bite Cases

There are instances in which an owner of a vicious animal might not be held liable for an attack by the animal. For example, if the animal owner adequately warned other people that the animal was dangerous, and took measures to keep the animal away from people, a person who ignored the owner's warnings and was injured by the animal might not successfully sue the owner. In legal terms, the injured person's behavior is known as "contributory negligence" or "assumption of the risk." An injured person is contributorily negligent when he or she fails to exercise the degree of care for his or her safety that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances. For example, if a person climbs over a fence and is bitten by a dog on the other side, a jury could decide not to hold the dog owner liable if they believe that a reasonable person would not have climbed over the wall in the first place.

An animal owner might also escape liability if the injured person "assumed the risk" of an attack by the animal. If the owner can show that the person bitten by his or her animal had actual knowledge of the risk of injury from the animal, but voluntarily exposed him or herself to that risk anyway, a court can bar the injured person from recovering damages. For example, if the owner puts up a "Beware of Dog" sign, and a person ignores this sign and gets bitten by the dog, the owner might not be responsible for that person's injury. If the animal owner is claiming either "assumption of risk" or "contributory negligence," however, the owner has the burden of convincing the jury of these arguments.

An animal owner can also argue that the injured person provoked the animal, and this may be a way for the owner to avoid liability. For example, if a person makes a threatening gesture toward an animal, and the animal attacks, this could negate the owner's liability.

The relationship between the owner and the injured person can also affect the owner's liability. For example, if the owner invites someone to his/her property, and the invited person (known legally as an "invitee") is injured, the owner can be held responsible if he/she did not warn the invitee of the potential danger of the dog. On the other hand, if someone is trespassing on the owner's property, the owner will probably not be liable for animal bites sustained by the trespasser (unless the injury is intentionally caused by the owner).

Other Potential Responsible Parties

Animal owners are not the only people who can be held responsible for animal bites.

Here are a few common scenarios where someone other than an animal owner could be held liable for an animal bite:

• Animal Keepers: Anyone who is responsible for the care or custody of an animal may be considered an owner or keeper and can be held responsible for an animal bite. Examples include kennels, a pound, or an animal sitter.
  
  
• Parents of Minors: Even if a person under 18 years of age owns the animal at issue, in many states, an injured person can bring a legal claim against the minor's parents, even if the parents had no involvement with the animal.
  
  
• Property Owners: A property owner can be liable for injuries caused by an animal the property owner has allowed onto his or her property.
  
  
• Landlords: If an apartment landlord knew (or should have known) that a tenant owned a dangerous animal, the landlord may also be liable for animal bite injuries.

Lawfirm@worldwideattorney.com

317.572.7717 Bloomington
317.572.7717 Carmel
317.572.7717 Crown Point
317.572.7717 Elkhart
317.572.7717 Fort Wayne
317.572.7717 Gary
317.572.7717 Hammond
317.572.7717 Indianapolis
317.572.7717 Kokomo
317.572.7717 Merrillville
317.572.7717 Mishawaka
317.572.7717 Muster
317.572.7717 South Bend
317.572.7717 Valparaiso
317.572.7717 West Lafayette

Common Causes of Indiana Truck Accidents
There are nearly 150,000 accidents involving large “big rig” trucks every year. Since Indiana is considered the center of the traffic patterns in the country it has more than its share of the truck accidents. Additionally, almost 10% of all automobile accident fatalities involved one of these large trucks—typically en route to making a delivery. [...]

Punitive Damages in Personal Injury Lawsuits
Punitive damages are awarded over and above compensatory damages and are designed to punish the wrongdoer and to deter similar conduct on the part of others. Punitive damages are awarded only when the defendant’s behavior is willful, intentional, reckless, outrageous or malicious in some way. As a consequence, punitive damages are typically not available in [...]

Nominal Damages as Injury Compensation
Nominal damages are small token awards given when the judge or jury finds the defendant has technically committed a tort, but the plaintiff did not suffer any harm as a result. Usually, nominal damages consist, as the name suggests, of a mere nominal amount of money such as $1 or $10. If you or a [...]

Compensatory Damages in a Personal Injury Claim
Compensatory damages are the most common form of monetary award in successful personal injury lawsuits. This is true because most personal injury lawsuits are based on negligence. As a general rule, plaintiffs in simple negligence cases may recover only compensatory damages. Compensatory damages are monetary payments intended to make the plaintiff “whole.” That is, they [...]